objective c - Naming conventions for Universal Applications -

-

i'm writing universal ios application (ipad , iphone) , find myself massively long names classes can't shared between 2 apps:

familyviewcontroller_iphone.h/m familyviewcontrollera_ipad.h/m  detailviewcontrollerb_iphone.h/m detailviewcontrollerb_ipad.h/m

and likewise, classes inside of these guys have complete name (device included) interface builder can use them.

i considered acontrollera.h , bcontrollera.h a=iphone , b=ipad not excited option either.

what standing convention classes in ios universal application - or (hopefully) missing obviates necessity?

i think you're heading down bad path separating functionality this. while ipad apps can have different ui structures , design iphone apps, it's best if can try remain abstract possible.

i avoid using platform names in view controllers. i'd have:

familyviewcontroller.h familyviewcontroller.m familyviewcontroller.xib (which used ipad ui) familyviewcontroller~iphone.xib

you're going have incredibly similar functionality both iphone , ipad, or if not same, you'll still have lot of overlap.

i never make view controllers act table controllers. keep functionality in separate objects. way, if iphone app has 2 or 3 tables on different screens, ipad shows 3 of tables on same screen can instantiate each of table controllers , of code reusable.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How to set Z index when using WPF DrawingContext? -

-
how set z-index drawing object when using drawingcontext.drawxxx() methods? the object drawn last have higher z index. can't change index of drawn objects. way draw in order. if using wpf (as placed tag), can use, example, canvas control. create shapes need like polyline obj = new polyline(); //... // ... set properties of obj and add them canvas uielementcollection: yourcanvasname.children.add(obj); //or yourcanvasname.children.insert(i, obj); first items of collection have higher z index. advantages in way: no need redraw on window changes, can anytime move objects , change order.
Read more

razor - Is this a bug in WebMatrix PageData? -

-
i think may have found bug in webmatrix's pagedata, not sure. concerns how pass data partial page calling page. in webmatrix documentation (tutorials, e.g. " 3 - creating consistent look ", , example code), pagedata recommended mechanism pass data between pages (e.g. content page layout page, or partial page). however have found not work other way, pass data partial page calling page. modifying or adding entries in pagedata in partial page, not seem calling page. cutting right down simplest possible example, in test page may have this: @{ pagedata["test"] = "initial entry"; } <p>before calling partial page, test value @pagedata["test"]</p> @renderpage("_testpartial.cshtml") <p>after returning calling page, test value @pagedata["test"]</p> and in _testpartial.cshtml page might have this: @{ pagedata["test"] = "modified entry"; } <p>in partial page...
Read more

visual c++ - Using relative values in array sorting ( asm ) -

-
i need sort through array , sort each individual row in array in ascending order. doesn't seem going (surprise!) keep getting hit 2 errors: a2101: cannot add 2 relocatable labels , a2026: constant expected here's sort, makes sense me, think i'm still trying implement high-lvl language techniqes assembly. there way around not being able use relative values? (the array 7 rows 9 columns, btw). mov cx, 7; cx = number of rows outer: ; outer loop walk through rows push cx mov cx, 9 mov row, cx ;rows middle: ; middle-loop walk through columns push cx sub cx, 1 ;cx = cx-1 mov column, cx ;columns inner: ;inner loop - compare , exchange column values cmp marray[row*9 + column], marray[row*9 + column+1] xchg marray[row*9 + column+1], marray[row*9 + column] ; compare , exchange values marray table inc column loop inner pop cx loop mid...
Read more