Is URT (universal runtime) equivalent to .net framework -


just curious ask. if 2 equivalent.

short answer: kind of. java vm better example, .net framework has of these elements.

the idea of "universal run-time" environment in programs written runtime live , work, can ported various hardware/os environments without program knowing difference.

java fits description quite nicely. can write java programs execute anywhere; on desktop or laptop, android mobile devices, embedded in web browsers. language, , others compile use in java vm, work on hardware has java vm, , necessary libraries supported (different devices have different i/o possibilities , graphics capabilities, instance).

.net... not quite much. .net run on "living" (still-supported) windows os, , on windows mobile devices, , there workalikes (mono) linux/mac , ports of c# language compile android , obj-c (iphone) environments, .net windows-only platform, , so, despite platform's popularity, not "universal". however, within bounds of windows environment, .net works beautifully "abstract" details change between os versions, , allows multiple languages compile down msil runtime digests native code, allowing 1 runtime handle projects source code in different, custom, languages. quite big chunk of urt concept.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How to set Z index when using WPF DrawingContext? -

razor - Is this a bug in WebMatrix PageData? -

visual c++ - Using relative values in array sorting ( asm ) -