castle windsor - Potentially Misconfigured Components using TypedFactory -

-

i'm learning how use windsor typedfactory: feature it's awesome! made work need, have concern having 1 potentially misconfigured components "castle.typedfactory.delegateproxyfactory" iproxyfactoryextension / delegateproxyfactory...

that's container , working... still concern waring built container

container = new windsorcontainer();  container.kernel.resolver.addsubresolver(new arrayresolver(container.kernel));  container.addfacility<typedfactoryfacility>(); container.register(component.for<itypedfactorycomponentselector>().implementedby<customtypedfactorycomponentselector>());  container.register (      component.for<contracts.iconverter>().implementedby<components.converter1>().named("converter1").lifestyle.singleton,       component.for<contracts.iconverter>().implementedby<components.converter2>().named("converter2").lifestyle.singleton,     component.for<contracts.iconverterfactory>().asfactory(c => c.selectedwith(new customtypedfactorycomponentselector())),      component.for<converterhelper>().lifestyle.transient );

adding 

container.register(component.for<itypedfactorycomponentselector>().implementedby<customtypedfactorycomponentselector>());

i solved additional "potentially misconfigured components" "castle.typedfactory.interceptor" typedfactoryinterceptor

how can fix remaining one?

crixo - there's reason why that's called potentially misconfigured component. notice emphasis.

the reason being, in case ''missing'' dependency here provided dynamically delegateproxyfactory , windsor can not verify statically.

so means if use component directly might end not being able resolve unless you'd provide missing dependency on fly. facility makes sure that, component resolved if used through facility.

in other words - can safely ignore warning.

ps,

since you're providing customtypedfactorycomponentselector inline don't need register it. future version of windsor able figure out dependencies , provide them you. right now, rest assured work.

in other words - can safely ignore warning.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - How to set Z index when using WPF DrawingContext? -

-
how set z-index drawing object when using drawingcontext.drawxxx() methods? the object drawn last have higher z index. can't change index of drawn objects. way draw in order. if using wpf (as placed tag), can use, example, canvas control. create shapes need like polyline obj = new polyline(); //... // ... set properties of obj and add them canvas uielementcollection: yourcanvasname.children.add(obj); //or yourcanvasname.children.insert(i, obj); first items of collection have higher z index. advantages in way: no need redraw on window changes, can anytime move objects , change order.
Read more

razor - Is this a bug in WebMatrix PageData? -

-
i think may have found bug in webmatrix's pagedata, not sure. concerns how pass data partial page calling page. in webmatrix documentation (tutorials, e.g. " 3 - creating consistent look ", , example code), pagedata recommended mechanism pass data between pages (e.g. content page layout page, or partial page). however have found not work other way, pass data partial page calling page. modifying or adding entries in pagedata in partial page, not seem calling page. cutting right down simplest possible example, in test page may have this: @{ pagedata["test"] = "initial entry"; } <p>before calling partial page, test value @pagedata["test"]</p> @renderpage("_testpartial.cshtml") <p>after returning calling page, test value @pagedata["test"]</p> and in _testpartial.cshtml page might have this: @{ pagedata["test"] = "modified entry"; } <p>in partial page...
Read more

visual c++ - Using relative values in array sorting ( asm ) -

-
i need sort through array , sort each individual row in array in ascending order. doesn't seem going (surprise!) keep getting hit 2 errors: a2101: cannot add 2 relocatable labels , a2026: constant expected here's sort, makes sense me, think i'm still trying implement high-lvl language techniqes assembly. there way around not being able use relative values? (the array 7 rows 9 columns, btw). mov cx, 7; cx = number of rows outer: ; outer loop walk through rows push cx mov cx, 9 mov row, cx ;rows middle: ; middle-loop walk through columns push cx sub cx, 1 ;cx = cx-1 mov column, cx ;columns inner: ;inner loop - compare , exchange column values cmp marray[row*9 + column], marray[row*9 + column+1] xchg marray[row*9 + column+1], marray[row*9 + column] ; compare , exchange values marray table inc column loop inner pop cx loop mid...
Read more